TSS: Fun with TBR Lists
November 22, 2009 at 12:44 pm | In Sunday Salon, TBR | 4 Comments
Just a short post today, because I have to get working on my NaNoWriMo project. When I am not thinking about plot and characters or worrying about how I will reach my word-count goal (in a meaningful way), I like to think about my reading plans for next year. I keep a notepad next to my computer, and throughout the week I jot down the names of books I read about online that look interesting. Yesterday I decided to put everything in a spreadsheet (what? procrastinating on NaNoWriMo? me?), and here’s what I found: I currently have 179 titles on my TBR wishlist, which consists of books I do not own. Scratch that: I have 179 fiction titles on my TBR list. I haven’t created the non-fiction spreadsheet yet!
As for my actual, physical TBR piles: I have several stacks of unread or partially-read books around the house, so I decided to count those as well. I have 82 unread books here at home–again, this is only the fiction–waiting for me to read them. That’s 261 titles, total!
I like to think of ways to tame the TBR list. The most obvious thing to do, of course, is to stop adding books, to keep the list under control. The problem is, at the end of six years, I would probably find that there were at least 261 interesting books released in the six years I was not adding books, so I would be right back where I started. The other thing I could do is apply the 50-page rule with a vengeance: if I pick up a book and it doesn’t grab me after 50 pages, I stop reading and strike it from the list. The only problem with that is I tend to be moody about my book choices, and I have ended up loving books upon the second read that I hated the first time around. Perhaps I could just move the title to the bottom of the list and give it another chance?
Another problem I have is how to choose which books from the TBR list to read. Should I print out the titles cut them up, and pull them out of a hat? Should I print a wallpaper-sized version of the list and throw darts? Blindfold myself, spin around and play “pin the tail on the TBR”? Ask an objective third party to choose?
Hm. Maybe I am procrastinating, just a little bit. But tell me, how do you tame your TBR? Or do you even try?
BTT: Posterity
November 19, 2009 at 10:38 am | In Booking Through Thursday | 14 Comments
Do you think any current author is of the same caliber as Dickens, Austen, Bronte, or any of the classic authors? If so, who, and why do you think so? If not, why not? What books from this era might be read 100 years from now?
That is a terrific question, but also a tough one. For one thing, consider the marketplace: how many more books are there from which to choose? How do we really know what might stand the test of time? Things shift so rapidly, it seems, that I almost feel that the question is unanswerable. To answer it, I would have to assume that the world is the same place 100 years from now that it is today, that our values are the same. We know how many artists we now revere struggled in their own times. Was it only luck that they were plucked out of history, that we now consider them classics?
I realize I am not really answering the question. Everything being equal, I would hope that people are still reading today’s authors. My list is unfortunately not very global. Looks like I need to broaden my horizons a bit. *cringe* Anyway, here are my picks:
My safeties:
- For one, I think John Updike is not only a terrific storyteller, but that he deals with life questions and human character in a way that makes his work timeless (if I may be so bold). I’ll say the Rabbit books, but especially Rabbit, Run will still be read.
- I would pick a few from Philip Roth, probably later works: American Pastoral and The Human Stain.
- Toni Morrison would be a serious contender, I think, because of her style, but also because of her invaluable view of history through fiction. I think Beloved is a serious contender.
- Hm…Cormac McCarthy, because his stories really transcend time. They are more like parables.
- Flannery O’Connor, because she is a master of Southern Gothic and of the short story in general.
All these seem kind of obvious, though, so here are some of my less conventional picks:
- Larry McMurtry’s Lonesome Dove, which is such a wonderful story, an a terrific vision of the American West.
- Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, because it’s a human story of war.
- Tom Wolfe’s Bonfire of the Vanities, because it displays (in a classic way) all the vulgarity of America in the 1980s.
- Chinua Achebe, Things Fall Apart, because I believe it will still be relevant in 100 years and it shows the danger of sublimating cultures through colonization. (Actually, this should maybe be on the safety list.)
- Margaret Atwood, both The Handmaid’s Tale and Cat’s Eye. This maybe should be under the safeties, but you never know…
- Michael Chabon, The Adventures of Kavalier and Clay, because it is a terrific, timeless story.
- Haruki Murakami, The Wind Up Bird Chronicle. This is a gut choice…I just think it’s worthy!
- Umberto Eco, The Name of the Rose or The Island of the Day Before. I hope he hangs on in a Lawrence Sterne way (What? What do you mean everybody doesn’t still read Tristram Shandy?), especially because his stories work so well.
I could go on. We have so many “best of” lists these days and so many prizes, so many authorities making declarations, I can’t imagine how people will parse through all the information, some of it commercial, some of it critical, to decide.
Update: I’ve been thinking about this all day: I created this list with the idea of “all things being equal” 100 years from now. I created it for fun, but I realize that it’s still a very Western list. I know in the last thirty years or so, scholars have worked to open up the canon to include more women and persons of different races and nationalities, but I think it’s important to remember, the canon has remained largely Western, and created by Western scholars. The most interesting thing that will influence literature as we know it in the next 100 years will be the rise of China and India, and that rise may bring more non-Western scholars to the table, so that the canon becomes something truly global, and not a Western canon that determines what “others” might participate.
What are your picks?
NaNoWriMo: Soundtrack
November 18, 2009 at 6:36 pm | In NaNoWriMo, Writing | Leave a Comment
One of my favorite series on the music and book blog Largehearted Boy is Book Notes, where authors create music playlists that somehow relate to their books. I find a lot of inspiration from music, especially when I am thinking about specific characters. I’ve been pursuing the story in one form or another that’s becoming my NaNoWriMo draft for about four or five years. Over the last few weeks the story has changed drastically, taking twists and turns I had never imagined when writing earlier incarnations.
I actually created a playlist for my original idea about a year and a half ago, when I finally decided that my story would be set in a very specific place and time: Odessa, Texas, in 1981. It just so happens that I lived in Odessa in 1981 (you might know Odessa from the movie or book Friday Night Lights, about the Permian Panthers high school football team), and like one of my main characters I was starting the seventh grade, but that’s mostly where the autobiographical material ends, with one exception: the music. I pulled together this soundtrack from what I remember as being popular around that time (1981 or earlier), what I heard on the radio (it was still AM then, with everything all mixed together), what I heard on the jukebox in the cafeteria at school, and what I heard in the cars of my friends’ older siblings as they drove us to football games.
My book is about two sisters, Melissa and Laurie Jenkins, who are both in junior high in 1981, when Melissa is abducted. Although she is returned unharmed, this event, followed by the brutal murder of a priest from a nearby town, sends a wave of change through the family, and will determine events that follow in their lives. That’s where it stands right now, anyway, and I am trying not to question it too much. It’s all a bit delicate, but I hope to have some excerpts to share by the weekend.
I was lucky I didn’t have to spend much time on this, because I am sure I could have avoided writing for many hours if I hadn’t already pulled most of this together. I have tweaked it a bit for certain characters, just by adding a few songs. Unfortunately, this isn’t the full list, either, but I think it’s a good representation. So, without further ado, my soundtrack for What Hope Looks Like to Other People:
AC/DC, “Back in Black.” Back in Black was released in the summer of 1980, and that fall the Permian Panthers won the Texas State Championship. This song became a sort of anthem for the team through the early 80s (I can’t say about later), and it would play over and over on the jukebox during lunch. The biggest thing for Laurie, who is in the ninth grade, is the fact that she will be going to Permian the following year. When the story begins, high school is like an end to her–the big finish, if you will. College is something vague and hazy, but to go to Permian–for those kids, it was like touching history. That’s how it is for Laurie.
Juice Newton, “Angel of the Morning.” This song works for the story on several levels. For Laurie, it’s a simple romantic song. For Melissa, it means being somebody special to someone, even if not in a romantic sense. For Pauline (their cousin, who has a somewhat major part to play), it represents a sort of desperate hope.
Bruce Springsteen, “Hungry Heart.” This is Melissa’s song for her father, who left three years before and lives in Houston, working for an oil company. She and Laurie visit him during the course of the story. He lives alone in a small apartment, so would not seem to fit the picture of philandering guy in the song, but he’s also a lonely romantic.
Cheap Trick, “Surrender.” This teen anthem works here mainly because Laurie wants so badly to surrender, while Melissa simply cannot. As she enters junior high, she watches her world and her friends change, and she has no idea where her place might be.
Rush, “Limelight.” This is one of those songs you might roll your eyes at now, but the album was released in March of 1981, and it was everywhere. The most popular song was “Tom Sawyer,” but I chose this one because I think again it speaks loudly to the struggles that not only the Jenkins sisters face growing up, but their family members and perhaps even the whole town. Midland/Odessa was experiencing a boom then, and they seemed primed to be the Dallas/Ft. Worth of West Texas, until the bottom fell out. The main question is, how does one go on?
ABBA, “Thank You for the Music.” I have a scene I am not sure will make it into the final draft, but I hope it does: Melissa and her best friend Darlene, in the fifth and sixth grade, would go to Darlene’s house after school every day and listen to The Album, making up performances for each other. When they enter junior high, their friendship shifts, and this is the song, which is a sort of farewell, that makes Melissa the most nostalgic for those days and their friendship.
Foreigner, “Blue Morning, Blue Day.” This song is for Melissa and Laurie’s cousin Pauline. Her character is not as well-drawn as the sisters at this point, but I know she is in her mid-20s, is divorced and has a child who has died.
Eddie Rabbit, “I Love a Rainy Night.” I sort of chose this song for the overall irony of the lyrics (“Showers wash all my cares away/I wake up to a sunny day”), but also for Laurie, who loves this song and who very much sees the world this way.
Roseanne Cash, “Seven Year Ache.” This is another song for Pauline, who meets and starts dating Eddie, a person who will have significant impact on their lives. This one also works on an ironic level…but I can’t say too much about it!
The Go Go’s, “Our Lips Are Sealed.” This is another song for Laurie, but I also chose it because it was one of the first sort of new wave song to hit the radio that year, and it signals a shift from the 70s into the 80s.
Genesis, “No Reply at All.” This song, off Abacab, drives a lot of the book. Basically, it’s a song about the inability to connect with someone, about feeling as though one is not seen or heard. It’s Melissa’s song, and she’s at the center of the story, even if the whole story is not hers. I think, in the end, she will control everything in the narrative.
TSS: First or Third?
November 15, 2009 at 11:47 am | In Sunday Salon | 2 Comments
This weekend I am working diligently to write 12,000 words so that I’ll be at the halfway point for NaNoWriMo. Everything is about moving forward at this point, about not losing momentum, but it occurred to me that what I am writing might work better from the first person point of view, instead of in the limited third person that it is now. I will move forward without changing it, but I already know that’s one of the major things I’ll have to consider at the end.
Thinking about that made me generally curious, so I thought I would do a sort of informal poll: What point of view do you find yourself enjoying the most? For example, think of your favorite books. Do you lean more toward one kind of narrative voice than another? Do you like it straight from the horse’s mouth, so to speak, or do you like shifting points of view? How do you feel about (intentionally) unreliable narrators?
I realize all this can depend heavily on the narrative and they story, but I’m just curious. I know writers tend to be very conscious of this point, and I wonder: are readers just as conscious?
Happy Sunday!
Reader’s Journal: Postcards from the Edge
November 13, 2009 at 5:37 pm | In 9 for '09, Fiction, Novels | 4 Comments
I was just shy of eight years old when Star Wars hit the silver screen in May of 1977. Like millions of young girls, I wanted to be Princess Leia. I spent many an afternoon in my pink room pretending to program an invisible R2-D2 (white beanbag chair) with a secret message for Obi-Wan Kenobi. (“Help me Obi-Wan Kenobi! You’re my only hope!”) What can I say? I was an only child, and I was Star Wars crazed. My obsession only grew with the release of The Empire Strikes Back in 1980 (which I saw so many times in the theater, I could talk along with the film). By then I was almost eleven, and even though boys were not in the picture yet, Harrison Ford certainly was. “You’re a scoundrel,” I would say to Han Solo (pillow). We would kiss (me and the pillow). It was all quite heady and romantic.
For all that, though, my most vivid memory of Carrie Fisher was at the Cotton Bowl in Dallas, 1983. We were enduring a rather soggy (but still wonderful) Simon and Garfunkel concert, being lashed by the tropical rains produced by Hurricane Alicia, when Paul Simon brought his new bride on stage and introduced her to the crowd. It was a lovely, sweet moment. They would be divorced less than a year later.
Published in 1987, Postcards from the Edge, Fisher’s first novel, is semi-autobiographical, following the character of actress Suzanne Vale through a stint at rehab and her first year of recovery. The novel is really more of a series of sketches. It opens with a few postcards from Suzanne to her friends and family, and then moves immediately to her thirty days in rehab, going back and forth between Suzanne’s journal (in first person) and the story of a cocaine addict named Alex (also in first person) who is in the rehab with her. Alex is so unbelievably paranoid, egotistical, and annoying that if you were standing with him near a cliff and he were telling his story in person, you would probably just go ahead and push him off to put you both out of your misery. Suzanne is focused on her recovery, and Alex is mostly focused on Suzanne, the only person in rehab he sees as “cool” as he sees himself, although he can’t work up the nerve to talk to her. The back and forth can be a little disconcerting (I disliked Alex so much, and I kept wanting to get back to Suzanne), but it does a good job I think of showing the mindset(s) of people in rehab, but also how Hollywood makes a fetish of the damaged:
Suzanne: In our culture [Marilyn Monroe, Judy Garland, Montgomery Clift, Lenny Bruce, Janis Joplin, John Belushi] are heroes. There’s something inside of that—a message that killing yourself like that isn’t so bad. All the interesting people do it, the extraordinary ones. A weird, weird message. Most of the people I’ve admired in show business—comedians, writers, actors—are alcoholics or drug addicts or suicides. It’s bizarre. And I get to be in that club now. It’s the one thing I cling to in here: Wow, I’m hip now, like the dead people.
Romancing the stoned.
Alex: This is so Not Hip. I don’t mean everything has to be hip. This is probably good for some people, but …Look at these people. I have nothing on common with any of them, except Suzanne. She’s been here a couple of weeks now. She seems like she’s really into this, but she’s an actress. Actresses can seem like they fit in anywhere. I’m mainly just gonna just talk to her. It would be great if we fell in love. That would show them, if I came back from the drug clinic with Suzanne Vale as my girlfriend.
The next four sections are all in third person, following Suzanne through her life after addiction as she tries to stay sober and navigate Hollywood and the movie business. She dates a sex-addicted producer and visits her therapist; she takes a part in a low-budget buddy cop movie being shot in the desert near her grandmother’s house; she attends a party and then takes to her bed. The reason I mention all this is because it seems like the book is a bit of an experiment–not in an Eco/Calvino/Pynchon postmodern sort of way, but in a new author, not-sure-how-I-want-this-all-to-work-on-the-page sort of way.
It’s a bit uneven, but it’s a first novel. Suzanne is insecure and funny. You like her and root for her all the way through the book. You want her to stay sober, you want her to meet a nice guy, you want someone to offer her the part of a lifetime. Fisher makes Suzanne a very real person in a crazy world that’s bent on make-believe, and it works. It’s like Entourage meets Lorrie Moore—Hollywood through the eyes of someone who has a superb sense of irony, even about herself.
One of my favorite parts is a conversation Suzanne has with her grandmother, basically about who she was when she was little, and what she should be now that she has grown up. Her grandmother calls out the generational differences: in her day, people picked a thing (or a person) and stuck with it; in Suzanne’s day, anything goes. Nobody wants to work hard on anything; they expect things to be easy. This part especially resonated with me:
“I’m one of those people who believe you do whatever you set your mind to,” her grandmother said. “But, that being said, I think some people have an easier time setting their minds down than others do, and your mind seems to hover. Your brother seems to have his head out of the clouds, but yours is right up there in them. You always read too much, always had your nose in a book. A bookworm. You just don’t seem to have a level look on things, and I don’t know if you can get that or not. Maybe you could just live with it. I don’t think it’s such a bad thing. Certainly there’s worse.”
I also liked the section where Suzanne takes to her bed, and eats and watches bad movies on cable. Her best friend Lucy comes over to join her:
“Remember what it was like when you’d be getting ready to jump rope,” she asked, “and two people were turning it, and you were waiting for exactly the right moment to jump in? I feel like that all the time.”
“I keep thinking that we’ll grow out of this,” said Lucy.
“Grow out of it?” said Suzanne. “How much growing do you do all of the sudden after thirty?”
“Maybe it’s a hormonal thing,” Lucy offered.
“Maybe it is food allergies,” said Suzanne. “Maybe my mom’s right. Maybe this is all tuna.”
“Could we be having a nervous breakdown?” Lucy asked. “A controlled nervous breakdown?”
“I don’t know,” Suzanne said doubtfully. “I’m not that nervous, and it’s not really a breakdown. It’s more of a backdown, or a backing off. A pit stop. That’s what we’re having, a nervous pit stop. A not-so-nervous pit stop.”
Overall, this was an entertaining read. Fisher writes dialogue well, and she’s funny. I should note: the book is quite a bit different than the movie. Suzanne’s mother has the tiniest bit part in the book (she offers to send her maid over to clean Suzanne’s house and fix her something to eat), while in the movie the mother-daughter relationship dominates the story. Fisher wrote the screenplay, so it’s interesting how the story changed focus. I haven’t seen the movie since it came out in 1990, but I would be interested in watching it again now that I’ve read the book. I can see why she had to re-work it, because as I said earlier, the book is really more like connected stories or sketches—I just think it’s interesting that Fisher picked a thread for the screen that’s almost non-existent in the book. Beyond that, I definitely plan to pick up another of Fisher’s novels, Surrender the Pink, and perhaps her memoir, Wishful Drinking.
This was my “Letter” pick for the 9 for ’09 challenge. Only two (and a half—I’m halfway through Drinking Coffee Elsewhere) more books to read for that one, and I’m finished!
BTT: Abandoning Bad Books
November 12, 2009 at 10:33 am | In Uncategorized | 19 Comments
“Life is too short to read bad books.” I’d always heard that, but I still read books through until the end no matter how bad they were because I had this sense of obligation.
That is, until this week when I tried (really tried) to read a book that is utterly boring and unrealistic. I had to stop reading.
Do you read everything all the way through or do you feel life really is too short to read bad books?
Drop them like a hot potato. I used to suffer through bad books, believing that some literary overlord was tallying up my unfinished books and making black marks on my record. This was why I made it all the way through The Devil Wears Prada and The Time Traveler’s Wife. (I know. I am one of the fourteen people in the universe who dislike this book.) Now, if a book isn’t working for me, I stop reading. This can happen for a number of reasons. Sometimes, a book is annoys me so much (Goldengrove, Julie and Julia, We Need to Talk about Kevin) I have to quit reading it. It can be the writing, it can be a character that rubs me the wrong way, you name it. My general rule of thumb is, if this book were a person, would I really want to be friends with them? Or, if the characters are intentionally difficult, am I learning anything here? Expanding my understanding of human nature in any way? If the answer is no, I stop.
Sometimes I stop reading a book because I am simply not in the mood for it, or can’t focus for some reason. Those books I generally place in a “save for later” pile, and I return to them and generally like them. When I first picked up Marisha Pessl’s Special Topics in Calamity Physics, I thought it was pretentious and annoying. But one day, I saw it there on my shelf and thought, why not give it another go? I picked it up from where I left off, and I absolutely could not put it down. In fact, when I finished it, I turned back to the beginning and started over! The only book in the latter category that I still haven’t been able to finish is The Little Friend, by Donna Tartt…but I love The Secret History, so I keep trying!
What about you? What makes you give up on a book–or what convinces you to stay through the bitter end?
NaNoWriMo: Inspiration
November 11, 2009 at 12:06 pm | In NaNoWriMo, Writing | 4 Comments
On Monday, I opened my draft and read through the 5,000+ words I had written in the past week for NaNoWriMo. Let’s forget for a moment that I should probably be somewhere in the 15,000-word range by now. I am still not worried about reaching my goal, and here’s why: after I read through my current draft, I realized that all I had, save for about three pages, was back story, back story, and more back story–you know, all that information one needs to know about a character that isn’t necessarily relevant to the action. At that moment, I realized I needed help.
Like a lot of bookish people, when I need help or inspiration, I turn to books. For many years, like a lot of people out there who are interested in writing, I’ve turned to Anne Lamott’s Bird by Bird. When I need straight-out, get-off-your-butt-and-write-you-can-do-this inspiration, nothing works better than this book. Plus, she’s funny. Take a look:
I know some very great writers, writers who you love who write beautifully and have made a great deal of money, and not one of them sits down routinely feeling wildly enthusiastic and confident. Not one of them writes elegant first drafts. All right, one of them does, but we do not like her very much. We do not think that she has a rich inner life or that God likes her or can even stand her. (Although when I mentioned this to my priest friend Tom, he said you can be sure that you have created God in your own image when God hates all the same people you do.)
I need to bring up radio station KFKD, or K-Fucked, here…If you are not careful, station KFKD will play in your head twenty-four hours a day, nonstop, in stereo. Out of the right speaker in your inner ear will come the endless stream of self-aggrandizement, the recitation of one’s specialness, of how much more open and gifted and brilliant and knowing and misunderstood and humble one is. Out of the left speaker will be the rap songs of self-loathing, the lists of all the things one doesn’t do well, of all the mistakes one has made today and over an entire lifetime, the doubt, the assertion that everything one touches turns to shit, that one doesn’t do relationships well, that one is in every way a fraud, incapable of selfless love, that one has no talent or insight, and on and on and on. You might as well have heavy-metal music piped in through headphones while you are trying to get your work done. You have to get things quiet so you can hear your characters and let them guide your story.
On Monday, though, I didn’t need inspiration to hear my characters, or to get moving. I needed what I’ll call technical inspiration, or in other words: how do I get off the endless wheel of back story and character description? For that, I turn to a book I recently discovered: Story, by Robert McKee. Technically, this is a book for screenwriters, but it is the best book about the mechanics (if I may be so crass) of writing a story that I have ever read. I’ve taken several workshops, read all kinds of books, have several writer friends, but one thing I’ve never really experienced, outside of this book, is a terrific technical discussion of how stories work. Writers like to talk about ideas, about prompts, about writing exercises, and especially, about other writers. But they don’t always like to break it down, to talk about the technical aspects. I think, in their defense, that this is because they fear people will believe that story can be reduced to a formula. In a sense, it can. But as McKee points out in is books, it is all the specifics one brings to character and story that make it unique. The process need not be mysterious–the characters bring us the mystery of what it is to be people in specific circumstances and reacting to those circumstances in unique ways.
So I spent some time with Mr. McKee (well, with his book), and now I have an idea of how to proceed, of what I need to get on the page. My characters suddenly have someplace to go. It was exactly what I needed to get the story moving again. (And no, I am not starting over. I’ll worry about editing those first 5,000+ words when all is said and done.) I would highly recommend this book to anyone wondering what to do next in a scene or a story, or particularly if you decide your 50,000 words might be better for the screen than for the page.
On that note, the Wall Street Journal had an article this past week entitled “How to Write a Great Novel,” where many well-known published writers discuss their writing process. A few of my favorites:
Orhan Pamuk: Turkish novelist and Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk often rewrites the first line of his novels 50 or 100 times. “The hardest thing is always the first sentence—that is painful,” says Mr. Pamuk…Mr. Pamuk writes by hand, in graph-paper notebooks, filling a page with prose and leaving the adjacent page blank for revisions, which he inserts with dialogue-like balloons. He sends his notebooks to a speed typist who returns them as typed manuscripts; then he marks the pages up and sends them back to be retyped. The cycle continues three or four times.
Kazuo Ishiguro: He collects his notes in binders and writes a first draft by hand. He edits with a pencil, then types the revised version into a computer, where he further refines it, sometimes deleting chunks as large as 100 pages.
Dan Chaon: His most recent novel, “Await Your Reply,” which has three interlocking narratives about identity theft, started out as scattered pictures of a lighthouse on a prairie, a car driving into the arctic tundra under a midnight sun and a boy and his father driving to the hospital at night with the boy’s severed hand, resting on ice. He described each scene on a card, then began fleshing out the plotlines, alternating among blue, pink and green cards when he moved between narratives.
Margaret Atwood: Ms. Atwood, who has written 13 novels, as well as poetry, short stories and nonfiction works, rarely gets writer’s block. When ideas hit her, she scribbles phrases and notes on napkins, restaurant menus, in the margins of newspapers. She starts with a rough notion of how the story will develop, “which usually turns out to be wrong,” she says. She moves back and forth between writing longhand and on the computer. When a narrative arc starts to take shape, she prints out chapters and arranges them in piles on the floor, and plays with the order by moving piles around.
Amitav Gosh: Amitav Ghosh’s first novel ended in failure. He was in his mid 20s, doing research on agricultural development at a think tank in Kerala, India. He worked on the first draft for a year. “It was terrible and I had to throw it all away,” he says…”It never gets easier; it’s always hard, it’s always a test,” says Mr. Ghosh, who splits his time between Goa, India, and Brooklyn, N.Y. “I’ve reached a point in my life where if a sentence seems easy, I distrust it.”
Reader’s Journal: The Hunger Games
November 9, 2009 at 10:25 am | In Fiction, Novels, Reader's Journal | 10 Comments
Last year, when I started this blog, everybody was talking about Suzanne Collins’s The Hunger Games. At first I ignored the reviews, because this is a young adult novel, and I haven’t read young adult novels since I was eleven or twelve years old. But one chance day, I read a review, and something about it must have struck me because I added this to my TBR list. Fast forward several months to August: I am in the Las Vegas airport, waiting for a flight home. I can’t seem to get into the book I have with me, so I wander into the book store to look for something to read on the plane. I browse and choose a book (The Likeness, by Tana French) and proceed to the counter to pay.
When it’s my turn, I hand my book to the cashier, and she tells me it was her second-favorite read from the past year, but her favorite book of the past year is—and no joke, we say this at the same time: The Hunger Games. How I knew she was going to say that, I cannot tell you. She could have just as easily said The Help, but somehow I knew she was going to say The Hunger Games. She proceeded right then and there—with customers lining up behind me—to give me a full review of the book. After that, it stuck in my brain and would not let go, so I finally checked it out from the library.
Most of you have probably already read this book, but just briefly for anyone who hasn’t: The nation of Panem, which occupies the ruined lands of North America, is divided into twelve districts and a Capitol. The people in the Capitol use many means to control the districts, in order to prevent any uprising against their harsh government. One of the ways they control the districts is through The Hunger Games. Every year, a boy and a girl between the ages of twelve and eighteen are chosen through a random drawing to travel to the Capitol and be a part of The Hunger Games, a true battle for survival. Only one contestant can win the game, and the rest will lose their lives.
Enter Katniss Everdeen, who volunteers for The Hunger Games after her twelve-year-old sister, Prim, is chosen in the drawing. We follow Katniss on her journey to the Capitol to prepare for the games, and then experience her fight for survival during the games themselves.
I realize this will seem completely random, but have you ever picked up a book and started reading and found that the minute a character is introduced you associate her (or him) either with an actor or someone you know? This happened to me with The Secret History, with the character of Bunny. At that point in time, I’d seen this actor in exactly one movie—The Scent of a Woman, and in a bit part at that—but when Donna Tartt introduced the character of Bunny, he was immediately Philip Seymour Hoffman (much younger then), and for me he remains as such until this day. I say this because the minute I met Katniss Everdeen, I saw Anne Hathaway. She’s probably too old for the part now, but that’s how Katniss will always appear in my head.
Okay, that’s out of the way: on to the book. If you are one of the few people left who hasn’t read this book, do try to get your hands on a copy in the near future. I was very lucky, I think, to be the age I was in the late Seventies and early Eighties, because there were so many smart young adult books by writers—S.E. Hinton, Paul Zindel, Judy Blume, Madeleine L’Engle, just to name a few—who treated young adults just like that—young adults. Honestly, there may still be hundreds of terrific YA writers out there today (I hear the names Patrick Ness and David Almond mentioned quite a bit, and I know Nick Hornby took a turn at writing YA), but I do not have children and know next to nothing about that market. Based on the Babysitter’s Club and Sweet Valley High and Hannah Montana tween nonsense I see everywhere (although, to be fair, I think Sweet Valley High may have been around when I was younger), I generally assumed that YA had sort of deteriorated into…well, into crap.
But I’m still not talking about the book, am I? All I can say is, anyone over the age of eleven or twelve (there are some rather graphic scenes during the games, and people—kids—do die) up to the age of…death, I guess, would enjoy this book. Suzanne Collins is so even-handed, and presents such a realistic portrait of this world she has created that you cannot help but be engaged. From the first word of the book, the world is real, and you are immersed in it. Katniss, like a lot of real children, was forced into a sort of early adulthood by the death of her father. Collins does an excellent job of walking that very fine line with characters between late childhood and early adulthood. Katniss never seems older than her years, even though she has the capabilities of an adult in many ways, something that was circumstantially thrust upon her rather than willingly sought. She is smart, and she is a survivor, but what she longs for most is stability and security, and she does her best to provide those things for her sister and herself.
The game scenes that make up much of the second half of the book are suspenseful and well-paced, and at times (for me, at least) a bit scary. Everything in the games is televised for the people in the Capitol and the districts, but the games exist both to exhibit the power of and to entertain the Capitol residents. I could not help but wonder if Collins wasn’t sending up the whole reality television idea of watching people struggle and suffer for our entertainment.
And there is a bit of a love story—I won’t say much about it for fear of giving anything away—but it fits in nicely with the plot instead of distracting from it. The fact of the matter is that every decision Katniss faces determines who she will become. It’s interesting to see a young woman in a situation like this dealing with choices about love not based on looks and popularity (or the traditional quarterback or geek scenario), but based on what will help her survive, and what sort of person she believes herself to be. How can she learn to trust her feelings, when her feelings are tied to her most basic survival instincts?
As for the writing, Collins writes neat, clean prose. She gives enough vivid detail so that you can create the rest of the picture yourself. I recently read a comment somewhere that someone preferred YA novels to adult novels because YA writers were not so concerned with “words,” and that adult novelists seem to be too interested in language and being clever, instead of being interested in the story. I think to be a writer or an avid reader and say you don’t care about words is like saying you love astronomy but you aren’t really interested in stars. Stories are words, they are nothing without language, and I imagine that YA novelists—the good ones anyway—spend as much time carefully weighing their word choices and perfecting their prose as adult novelists do. After all, today’s YA reader becomes tomorrow’s adult reader, and I believe the good YA novelists are quite aware that they are working with malleable young minds, teaching them how to appreciate language and story.
I also wanted to add that reading this book reminded me of reading Madeleine L’Engle’s books so long ago. Again, I think it’s her even-handed presentation of Katniss, how she makes her struggles and decisions so real, and how the world exists in shades of grey, rather than the usual black-and-white. I have a renewed interest now in YA, and I look forward to reading the second book in this series, Catching Fire.
Some passages (most of my favorites give too much away):
I’ve been right not to cry. The station is swarming with reporters with their insectlike cameras trained directly on my face. But I’ve had a lot of practice at wiping my face clean of emotions and I do this now. I catch a glimpse of myself on the television screen on the wall that’s airing my arrival live and feel gratified that I appear almost bored.
Both Peeta and I run to the window to see what we’ve only seen on television, the Capitol, the ruling city of Panem. The cameras haven’t lied about its grandeur. If anything, they have not quite captured the magnificence of the glistening buildings in a rainbow of hues that tower into the air, the shiny cars that roll down the wide paved streets, the oddly dressed people with bizarre hair and painted faces who have never missed a meal. All the colors seem artificial, the pinks too deep, the greens to bright, and the yellows too painful to the eyes, like the flat round disks of hard candy we can never afford to buy at the tiny sweet shop in District 12.
Morning brings distress. My head throbs with every beat of my heart. Simple movements send stabs of pain through my joints. I fall, rather than jump from the tree. It takes several minutes for me to assemble my gear. Somewhere inside me, I know this is wrong. I should be acting with more caution, moving with more urgency. But my mind seems foggy and forming a plan is hard. I lean bank against the trunk of my tree, one finger gently stroking the sandpaper surface of my tongue, as I assess my options. How can I get water?
TSS: Cheating, and New Books
November 8, 2009 at 12:03 am | In Sunday Salon | 9 Comments
This week, for the first time ever, I thought about cheating on reading a book. You see, I am supposed to read Three Cups of Tea for my book club this Tuesday, and I’ve read a scant thirty pages. Someone else in the group had seen a show about Greg Mortenson on the BBC (and therefore does not plan to read the book herself), and on Friday afternoon I found myself cruising the Internet, looking for a streaming version of the show. Usually I would never cheat on a book—I would either read it or not read it and confess. But with this one…well, I think the conversation could be quite interesting, but do I really need to read about it to join the conversation? But then again, it is a book club. And I admit—I thought about cheating on last month’s book, Twilight, but I couldn’t bring myself to watch the movie. No. (Of course, I couldn’t bring myself to read the book, either, but that’s another story.)
No matter. I couldn’t find the video—although I did find a slew of interview clips and articles on this site—and I told myself that it was a sign that I should not cheat. I should try to read the book over the weekend. Problem: we had a couple of parties to attend, and I have my “novel” to work on, so I haven’t managed to pick up the book. I have decided to read the articles and watch the clips. I may still read the book, but not by Tuesday.
What about you out there? Have you ever cheated on reading a book for a book club?
So remember my stacks of books from last week? Well, I got three more books in the mail last week. Here’s what I added to the pile:
The Lacuna, by Barbara Kingsolver. A review copy from Harper Collins. I’ve already read a few reviews of this, and it sounds like it’s going to be a great read.
My Antonia (Oxford World’s Classics), by Willa Cather. This has been on my TBR list as long as I can remember. I won this lovely Oxford Classics edition through a giveaway on dovegreyreader.
The Next Queen of Heaven, by Gregory Maguire. Through the Concord Free Press. I gave to NPR as my charity, and when I’ve finished the book, I must pass it on to another lucky reader. Will it be you?
As for challenges, I finished another book, Postcards from the Edge, so I will soldier forth this week with ZZ Packer’s collection, and then move on to the final two books on my list for 9 for ’09, The Red Tent and Norwegian Wood. When I’ve finished those, I move on to those wonderful, tempting stacks of books. Half the fun of reading is all the possibility between those covers, no?
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.



