TSS: Cheating, and New Books

sunsalon1This week, for the first time ever, I thought about cheating on reading a book. You see, I am supposed to read Three Cups of Tea for my book club this Tuesday, and I’ve read a scant thirty pages. Someone else in the group had seen a show about Greg Mortenson on the BBC (and therefore does not plan to read the book herself), and on Friday afternoon I found myself cruising the Internet, looking for a streaming version of the show. Usually I would never cheat on a book—I would either read it or not read it and confess. But with this one…well, I think the conversation could be quite interesting, but do I really need to read about it to join the conversation? But then again, it is a book club. And I admit—I thought about cheating on last month’s book, Twilight, but I couldn’t bring myself to watch the movie. No. (Of course, I couldn’t bring myself to read the book, either, but that’s another story.)

No matter. I couldn’t find the video—although I did find a slew of interview clips and articles on this site—and I told myself that it was a sign that I should not cheat. I should try to read the book over the weekend. Problem: we had a couple of parties to attend, and I have my “novel” to work on, so I haven’t managed to pick up the book. I have decided to read the articles and watch the clips. I may still read the book, but not by Tuesday.

What about you out there? Have you ever cheated on reading a book for a book club?

So remember my stacks of books from last week? Well, I got three more books in the mail last week. Here’s what I added to the pile:
lacunaThe Lacuna, by Barbara Kingsolver. A review copy from Harper Collins. I’ve already read a few reviews of this, and it sounds like it’s going to be a great read.

My Antonia (Oxford World’s Classics), by Willa Cather. This has been on my TBR list as long as I can remember. I won this lovely Oxford Classics edition through a giveaway on dovegreyreader.

The Next Queen of Heaven, by Gregory Maguire. Through the Concord Free Press. I gave to NPR as my charity, and when I’ve finished the book, I must pass it on to another lucky reader. Will it be you?

As for challenges, I finished another book, Postcards from the Edge, so I will soldier forth this week with ZZ Packer’s collection, and then move on to the final two books on my list for 9 for ’09, The Red Tent and Norwegian Wood. When I’ve finished those, I move on to those wonderful, tempting stacks of books. Half the fun of reading is all the possibility between those covers, no?

NaNoWriMoan: Updates

nano_09_red_participant_120x90I am happy to report that as of today, I have 2,274 words. Yes, out of 50,000. Yes, I realize that’s really only a tad over what should be my daily goal. Yes, I said I was happy. Sheesh!

I’m happy because even though my writing muscles have atrophied somewhat, I am pleased to see they still work. My sole reason for doing this was to start writing again. I haven’t attempted anything more than a few paragraphs in about four years, so 2,274 words is a terrific start. It’s been much easier than I hoped, when I have been able to sit down to work on this project, to be carried away by the story, and I’m doing a good job of not revising myself too much as I go.

Over the top with the pep talk, the happy-happy joy-joy? Okay. Let’s get serious.

I’ve had this idea for about five years. Very simply, it revolves around a missing girl, and the way her disappearance affects the people in the town. Problem: any number of really well-written novels based on this very idea already exist (and the ones I’ve read are watching over my shoulder). But it’s what I have at the moment, and the idea continues to plague me, no matter how I try to move on to anything else. So, in addition to getting my writing muscles back in shape, I’m hoping I can exorcise this idea and maybe get on to something else.

I started with this idea as a short story, but I very consciously decided that even though I am using at least one of the characters from that story, I am not using any of the previous material. Everything’s from scratch. What surprised me, though, when I sat down to write was that instead of sort of recreating from memory what used to be there on the page (I have a tendency to write the same thing over and over, which might be one reason I never get anywhere), all of the sudden I was there, in a new place, with the missing girl. Before, she was mostly all background–an image on a security video, a picture on a poster or flier announcing her disappearance, a school picture flashed on the evening news–but now she’s here in my draft, flesh and blood (her name is Melissa, by the way) and there are things going on I never suspected.

And now her captor, Eddie, is also part of the story, also more than an image on a security video, and I am not sure what to do with him. I get the feeling he’s not all bad, that he’s confused. I know, I know…that sounds strange. Anyone who carries off a twelve-year-old girl must be bad, right? Oh boy. Looks like that’s part of what I have to find out about this particular story. It’ll have to wait a bit, though, because I’ve started a chapter with someone else now. The weekend looks promising!

P.S. I’d like to give a special “Welcome” to NaNoWriMo participants visiting from Andrea’s site. I am definitely inspired by everyone’s progress!

BTT: Biography or Autobiography?

btt2Which do you prefer? Biographies written about someone? Or Autobiographies written by the actual person (and/or ghost-writer)?

I think it depends on the person, but because this is a book blog, after all, I’ll stick with author biographies/autobiographies and go with the totally lame answer of both. I like the scholarly distance of biographies, but I enjoy the first-hand account of “what really happened” (or, more aptly, “what I was really thinking, or at least what I am going to tell you I was thinking”). Reading both, we get a complete picture, even of the inconsistencies that make people so interesting.

Reader’s Journal: A Reliable Wife

ReliableWifeThis is my 9 for ‘09 challenge pick for Cover, a book that interested you either because the cover is pretty or ugly.

I won’t lie to you: I chose this book for its cover. But I didn’t pick it out for the challenge because of its cover. In fact, I had picked another book altogether, Summer at Tiffany. I decided to switch to this one because it’s true: the cover wouldn’t leave me alone. Every time I saw the image on a book site, I found myself clicking on it. I never could remember what the book was about, actually, even though I read the description more than once. Something about the cover design just pulled me in. Has that ever happened to you, where you find that every time you’re perusing the shelves (either virtually or physically), you find yourself drawn to a particular book time and again because of the cover?

When I realized it was futile for me to resist–that this book would have me, eventually–I gave up and moved it to the top of my wish list, and someone bought it for me for my birthday. I mentioned in last week’s Booking through Thursday post that there was a line in the description that made me pick the book up, and that is true as well, but the cover was my first attraction.

A Reliable Wife is set in Wisconsin at the turn of the Twentieth century. Ralph Truitt, a wealthy business man, has placed an advertisement in the Chicago paper for “a reliable wife.” He is answered by Catherine Land, who tells Truitt she is the daughter of a missionary, a plain religious woman:

I am not a schoolgirl. I have spent my life being a daughter and had long since given up hope of being a wife. I know that it isn’t love you are offering, nor would I seek that, but a home, and I will take what you give because that is all that I want. I say that not meaning to imply that it is a small thing. I mean, in fact, that it is all there is of goodness and kindness to want. It is everything compared to the world I have seen, and if you will have me, I will come.

This is a novel where nothing is as it seems, and people are telling the truth even as they lie. The deceptions begin almost immediately, but in every deceptive act is a kernel of true desire. Desire, in fact, is the heart of this book: sexual desire, the heart’s  desire, desire for a home, desire for peace, desire for redemption and forgiveness. Unfortunately, to discuss much of the plot would be to give too much of the book away. Catherine and Truitt’s relationship intensifies and develops in such a way that even as one deceives the other, they both believe they are getting what they want, or perhaps what they deserve.

The harsh winter landscape of Wisconsin serves both as a backdrop and a metaphor for the cold plains of the heart where Truitt and Catherine reside. Goolrick presents the landscape as both beautiful and harsh, alternately comforting and treacherous in its silence. I’ve always enjoyed books about the plains, about settlers who crossed and made lives all through the Nineteenth and into the Twentieth century. At the end of the book, Goolrick explains that his inspiration was a book by Michael Lesy called Wisconsin Death Trip:

Its collage of words and photographs paint a haunting, cinematic portrait of a small town in Wisconsin at the diseased end of the nineteenth century. We had imagined the cities to be teeming with moral turpitude and industrial madness, and rural America to sleeping in a prosperous innocence, filled with honest and industrious people. Not so. Lesy unlocks the Pandora’s box of country life to show us its dark and ravaged soul.

I have not read Wisconsin Death Trip, although I did go so far as to check to see if the local library has a copy (it does), so I can check it out sometime in the near future. However, even without reading the book that so inspired Goolrick, I feel he has “[unlocked] the Pandora’s box of country life,” given them the layers of complexity they are so often denied.

Some favorite passages (that won’t give anything away!):

In every house they passed, there were lives that were wholly known to him. In these houses, people knew one another; they knew him as well. He had held their babies, been to their weddings, been shocked by their sudden flights into madness and rage. He was and he wasn’t a part of their lives. He was there and he had done what was required of him, what was expected.

They went crazy in the cold; they went deep into the heart of their religion and emerged as lunatics.

She was a lonely woman who answered a personal advertisement in a city paper, a woman who had traveled miles and miles on somebody else’s money. She was neither sweet nor sentimental, neither simple nor honest. She was both desperate and hopeful. She was like all those foolish women whose foolish dreams made her and her friends howl with hopeless derision, except that now she was looking into the face of such a woman it it didn’t seem funny at all.

Love drove people crazy. He saw it every day. He read it every week in the paper. Every week the papers were filled with the barn burnings, the arsenic taken, the babies drowned in wells to keep their names secret, to keep their fathers away from them, to keep them from knowing the craziness of love. To send them home to the holiness of God. He read these stories aloud to Catherine at night, after supper, and she would invent stories about the sad women and the deranged men. She would say their names over and over, until even their names became a kind of derangement.

She spent her afternoons in the public library, its high windows slanting the pale thin winter light down on the long tables where men and women, ladies and gentlemen, the latter mostly young and handsome with glossy hair and ruddy cheeks, sat and passed an afternoon reading novels or the newspaper, or seriously researching things with maps and biographies and dictionaries. She liked these people. She sat among them as one of them, a stranger to them as they were to one another, and she was happy.

TSS: Doubts

sunsalon1When I flipped the calendar page to November this morning, it struck me what a very busy month I have in store. Unfortunately I was right at the point in my Sunday morning where I realize I’ve had too much coffee, and I go straight from feeling energized to feeling panicked.

For one thing, I opened my 2009 Books page to record what books I’d read in October, and realized I only read three. Three. Just to get through the 9 for ‘09 challenge, I still have five more books to read. (This is probably where I should mention that I sort of cheated. I replaced two books on the list–”Used” Adventures of Kavalier and Clay with “Used” The Poisonwood Bible; “Cover” Summer at Tiffany with “Cover” A Reliable Wife. They fit the categories and I just read them, so it’s not like I replaced them with something I read, say, last year, right?) For the books I’ve finished, I still have to write three reviews.

LT_booksThen I have five Library Thing books to read and review, because I have the feeling they won’t send me anything else until I get on the ball. Not that I really need them to send me anything else, when I clearly have plenty of other reading to do, and at the rate I’m going, well…And yes, that one on the bottom of the stack, The Women’s Home Workout Bible, isn’t exactly a book I have to read and leave quotes from, but still, one wants to do a thorough job, no? (And no, it’s not a religious approach to working out or anything like that–no Bible verses to recite to make yourself thinner. It’s actually a quite handy little reference and workout book that discusses different levels of equipment and exercises, all illustrated helpfully with pictures. Wait–do you think this can count as my review?) I’ve tried to read both A Short History of Women and The Well and The Mine, but neither one of them has grabbed me. Usually it’s just a mood thing when that happens, but I must admit, Kate Walbert has left me cold before, so there you go.

HC_booksI would have enough on my plate to deal with if I only had those books to consider, but this past week I got this nifty little stack of books from the people at Harper Collins (in the interest of full disclosure). I’m especially interested to read…oh, hell, I’m interested to read all of them. That’s always the trouble, isn’t it? I only wish I could figure out a way to wedge the Anne Frank book and Power Trip into the World Citizen challenge, because then I’d only have three more books to read, and might be able to finish before the end of the…oh, who am I kidding?

To top off everything, today is the beginning of NaNoWriMo. In case you missed it, I lost my mind and signed up. FIFTY THOUSAND words (I almost wrote “pages” instead of “words”–gulp) in THIRTY days. That’s about 1700 words a day. I have characters, a place, a time period, and a vague idea of what happens. Now all I need are FIFTY THOUSAND words that are somewhat coherent and shape a story. Oh, I feel a bit dizzy. I’m just going to lie down for a bit…

Happy Sunday, everyone!

Booking Through Thursday: Blurbs

btt2Suggested by Jenny’s Books:

Something I’ve been thinking about lately: “What words/phrases in a blurb make a book irresistible? What words/phrases will make you put the book back down immediately?”

Warning: Over-analysis ahead.

I was thinking about a very similar topic yesterday, and I considered discussing it in a Sunday Salon, but here’s my chance! Actually, I was thinking specifically about asking, “Has a blurb from an author ever caused you to avoid or buy a book?” For example, on the cover of A Reliable Wife, there’s a blurb from Sara Gruen, who wrote Water for Elephants: “Astonishing, complex, beautifully written,and brilliant.” I found this book online, put it on a wish list, and received it as a birthday gift. I never saw the, uh, “endorsement blurb.” Most likely, if I had, it probably wouldn’t have mattered one way or another. I liked Water for Elephants, but I didn’t love it. Sorry, Sara Gruen, and no offense, but your blurb would not make me buy the book.

Now, if a book had a blurb from Lorrie Moore or Richard Russo or Sarah Waters, I might buy it. But I would probably already be picking up the book for other reasons: a review, the author, or even the title. Once I pick up the book (or look it up online), then yes, I base the decision on the blurb–not the author endorsement blurb, mind you, but the “what the book is about blurb,” also known as the publisher’s description. The truth is, you can’t see the author endorsements online, unless the site takes the time to add them to the page. I chose A Reliable Wife because the description was intriguing, and I liked the cover (and to be honest, I think those things happened in reverse order–I liked the cover, and then I read the description).

But to answer Jenny’s question, I am not sure that there are any words or phrases that would make me pick something up or put it down, except maybe “Jodi Picoult (or Stephanie Meyer) loves this book!” But really, that would not be fair, either; just because I don’t like their writing doesn’t mean they can’t appreciate good books, and endorse them as such, right?

ReliableWifeI decided to look back at the description in the book jacket of A Reliable Wife and see if I could spot the exact phrase that drew me in, and here it is: “Set just after the turn of the twentieth century…” I’ve been very interested in anything set between 1890 and just after 1945, so that definitely drew me in. But it was the first sentence of the third paragraph of the description, so I was already interested. I suppose, though, that the phrase “Set just after the turn of the twentieth century…” did cinch the deal.

Sorry to go on, but when I started thinking about this yesterday, I realized how very difficult this all must be for authors. They don’t write their own descriptions, they don’t design their own covers, and generally for the endorsement blurb, they have to go with whoever says “yes” to their request. I know that part for a fact, because back when I was in school, I remember one of my professors, Lee Martin (who wrote The Bright Forever, which was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize and is a beautiful book, please please read it!) talking about being rejected by authors when he’d requested a blurb or a forward. Even though he managed to score Amy Bloom to write the forward to his story collection, I think the sting of rejection from other authors still hurt, even if it had nothing to do with his writing, but was simply a factor of time or just plain laziness or self-interest.

And for all that, do we really follow the blurb? Or do we listen to each other? I can’t wait to read everyone’s answers, because I also wonder how much the blurb-factor will change (has changed?) with the advent of e-books and self-publishing. Sorry to hijack your question, Jenny, but it was a good one!

Teaser Tuesdays

teasertuesdays32Teaser Tuesdays is a weekly bookish meme, hosted by MizB of Should Be Reading. Anyone can play along! Just do the following:

- Grab your current read
- Open to a random page
- Share two (2) “teaser” sentences from somewhere on that page
- BE CAREFUL NOT TO INCLUDE SPOILERS! (make sure that what you share doesn’t give too much away! You don’t want to ruin the book for others!)
- Share the title & author, too, so that other TT participants can add the book to their TBR Lists if they like your teasers!

From page 243 of The Poisonwood Bible, by Barbara Kingsolver:

She didn’t speak to him directly; it was more like she was talking straight to God, or the air, or the lizards who’d paused halfway up the walls, and if father should overhear her, that was his nickel. She declared she was taking us out of here as soon as she found the way to do it.

I’m almost finished with this amazing book. I cannot believe I didn’t read it sooner.

9 for ‘09: Haunted Ground

HauntedGroundI chose Erin Hart’s Haunted Ground as my pick for my “Strange” book, or a book that was from an unfamiliar genre. Since that time, I’ve read a number of mysteries, but I’m still new enough to the genre to feel like I am discovering something every time I pick up a new mystery.

Haunted Ground is the first in a series that follows Nora Gavin, an American pathologist, and Cormac McGuire, an Irish anthropologist. These two are drawn into mysteries through the work they do at archeological sites–at least on the surface. Nora is haunted by the murder of her sister, while Cormac is haunted by his relationship (or lack thereof) with his father and the death of his late mentor. In every sense, these “hauntings” drive Cormac and Nora through mystery presented to them in Haunted Ground.

At the story’s opening, the McGann brothers are cultivating peat bricks from a bog near their home when they come across an object in the peat:

Working deliberately, Brendan dug around the perimeter of the fibrous mat, probing for its edges, and scraping away loose bits of peat. He knelt on the spngy bank and pulled at the strands that began to emerge from the soaking turf. This was not horsehair; it was tanlged and matted, all right, but it was too long and far too fine to be the rooty material his father called horsehair. Brendan worked his broad fingers into the dense black peat he’d pried loose with the spade. Without warning, the block in his left hand gave way, and he cast it aside.

…Almost touching his knee were the unmistakable and delicate curves of a human ear. It was stained dark tobacco brown, and though the face was not visible, something in the line of the jaw, and the dripping tangle of fine hair above it, told him at once that the ear belonged to a woman.

So begins the mystery of the cailín rua, the red-haired girl. But as Nora and Cormac begin their investigation at the scene, they find that the red-haired girl doesn’t comprise the only mystery in the area. A stranger appears at the site of the dig, afraid that what’s been discovered are the bodies of his wife and son, missing for the last two years. This second mystery turns out to be the obsession of a third investigator, Detective Garrett Devaney, who is convinced of the husband’s guilt.

Hart handles these intertwining mysteries deftly, and through them she manages to intersperse a great deal of information about archeology and pathology, Irish and English politics, religion, class feuds, and local laws and folklore. I had forgotten, until I picked the it up again to write the review, how densely packed this book is. To read it is to feel fully immersed in the country and culture of Ireland, but it’s also a great story. As packed as it is, it moves smoothly along, and it’s difficult to put down. While the mysteries in the book are eventually solved, what haunts Nora and Cormac throughout the novel remains at the end. More than simply setting up the second book in the series, Hart leaves the ending open for these characters because they are more than simple outlines of people who solve crimes: they are both fully-realized characters whose goals in their lives outside of work are sometimes at complete odds, which makes them compelling as partners and people. I will definitely be reading the second book in the series, Lake of Sorrows, and will look forward to The False Mermaid, the third book in the series being published in March 2010.

A few more passages:

Cormac carefully lifted the damp strands and laid them aside, then froze when he saw what lay beneath. The girl’s mouth was clamped tightly shut, her top teeth embedded in the flesh of her lower lip. One eye stared wildly; the other was half closed. Her face seemed distorted with fear, a far cry from the images he’d seen of Iron Age bog men, whose unblemished bodies and tranquil expressions led to theories that they were either drugged, or willing victims of sacrifice. In its brief exposure to the air, the girl’s hair had already begun to dry, and a few strands began to play in the breeze that scooped down into the trench. Something about this tiny movement made it seem, for one surreal instant, that she was alive.

Half-eleven found Cormac and Nora hard at work on the excavation site. Banks of low gray cumulus clouds scudded across the sky from west to east, and a damp breeze from the ocean blew in over the mountains. Resting for a moment on the spade handle, Cormac thought about his own life, and what might remain of it in three hundred, eight hundred, or a thousand years; items he’d lost down the floorboards, or hidden so no one else could find them, until he, too, had lost track of their existence. He identified with the hoarders of earlier ages, burying and protecting their precious possessions, and then–whether through faulty memory, migration, or death–unable to reclaim them.

TSS: Challenges

sunsalon1First, congratulations to everyone who participated the Read-a-thon! I imagine things will be quiet in blogland today…everybody’s asleep!

This past week, I’ve been thinking about the challenges I signed up for earlier in the year, and I decided that with the exception of the two books I already have out of the library (one is for book club), I will dedicate the rest of the year to reading challenge books, and see if I can finish at least one (challenge, that is). I know some people work full time and participate in, like, ninety-six challenges a year. I only signed up for four, mostly because they sounded fun but also, I’ll admit, because I was unemployed and I needed to feel productive. I needed some goals. And, well, I still need goals. Who doesn’t? I am not a terribly disciplined reader, but one must try, no? So here’s what’s on my plate:

9 for ‘09

This is the challenge I think I am most likely to be able to complete, mainly because I’ve already read three of the books on the list. My 9 for ‘09 Challenge reading list:

  • Long. A book that’s longer than the books you usually read: Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell, by Susanna Clarke – Completed and reviewed
  • Free. A book recieved as a gift or through a swap or mooch: Drinking Coffee Elsewhere, by ZZ Packer
  • Dusty. A book that’s been on your shelf for three years or more: The Red Tent, by Anita Diamant
  • Used. A book you bought used: The Adventures of Kavalier and Clay, by Michael Chabon (purchased from Powell’s)
  • Letter. A letter from your name, matched to a letter in a book’s title (first letter of my first name, which is “P”): Postcards from The Edge, by Carrie Fisher
  • Strange. A book from an unfamiliar genre: Haunted Ground, by Erin Hart – Completed, needs review
  • Distance. A book by an author whose birthplace is more than 1000 miles away from where you live: Norwegian Wood, by Haruki Murakami. He was born in Kyoto, and I live in Atlanta.
  • Alive or Not. A book by any living author who has won or been nominated for a literary prize, or something by a dead author: Never Let Me Go, by Kazuo Ishiguro, a finalist for the Man Booker Prize – Completed, needs review
  • Cover. Pick a book based on its cover–ugliest or prettiest–and explain how the book does or does not live up to its cover: Summer at Tiffany, by Marjorie Hart

Orbis Terrarum

If I finish 9 for ‘09, then I’ll move to this challenge next. It’s long, but I think I have a chance of finishing these books. The 1% Well-Read challenge has several longer books. I think The Magic Mountain alone would hang me up not to mention The Ambassadors. My picks for the Orbis Terrarum challenge, where I must read ten books from ten different countries by December 2009:

1. The Book Thief – Markus Zusak (Australia) – Completed, needs review
2. 100 Years of Solitude – Gabriel Garcia Marquez (Columbia)
3. The Savage Detective – Roberto Bolano (Chile)
4. Wide Sargasso Sea – Jean Rhys (Dominica) – Completed and reviewed
5. One of three choices for Canada: Kamouraska - Anne Hébert; The Road Past Altamont – by Gabrielle Roy; or The Little Country – Charles DeLint
6. Red Mandarin Dress: An Inspector Chen Novel - Qiu Xiaolong (China)
7. Snow - Orhan Pamuk (Turkey)
8. Out Stealing Horses – Per Petterson (Norway). My backup: The Girl with The Dragon Tattoo by Steig Larsson (Sweden).
9. Something by Kenzaburo Oe (Japan)
10. Sea of Poppies – Amitav Ghosh (India)

1% Well-Read

This challenge actually continues until March 31, 2010, so I’ll keep going after the New Year with this one. Several of these overlap with the Orbis Terrarum challenge, so hopefully I will be in good shape. My 1% Well Read challenge picks are listed below. I’m doing thirteen books from the combined lists, A star (*) indicates a book I already own, and I’ve noted where they overlap with other challenges:

1. *Never Let Me Go – Kazuo Ishiguro (9 for ‘09; dropped from original list) – Completed, needs review
2. *The Plot Against America – Philip Roth (Started, but never finished)
3. *Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay – Michael Chabon (9 for ‘09)
4. *Blind Assassin – Margaret Atwood (Dropped from original list)

5. The Savage Detectives – Roberto Bolano (Orbis Terrarum)
6. 100 Years of Solitude – Gabriel Garcia Marquez (Orbis Terrarum)

7. Wide Sargasso Sea - Jean Rhys (Orbis Terrarum) – Completed and reviewed
8. *The Magic Mountain – Thomas Mann (Started, but never finished. Note to self: this is not a beach read.)
9. *If on A Winter’s Night A Traveler – Italo Calvino
10. *Suite Francaise – Irene Nemerovsky
11. *The Big Sleep – Raymond Chandler

12. The Poisonwood Bible – Barbara Kingsolver - Currently reading
13. The Ambassadors – Henry James

World Citizen

I’m afraid this is the challenge I may not complete…although it is somewhat short, and I might be able to get through it. However, given how long Marie Antoinette: The Journey took me (about a month), I imagine Mary, Queen of Scots might hold me up. I don’t read biography as fast as I read fiction.

Major level: read five books from three different categories. The categories are: politics, economics, history, culture/anthropology/sociology, world issues, and memoir/autobiography. I’ve settled on the following books from my shelves:

History - Mary Queen of Scots, by Antonia Fraser
World IssuesThe World Is Flat, by Thomas Friedman
Memoir - Falling Leaves, by Adeline Yen Mah – Completed and reviewed
Culture/Sociology/AnthroA History of God, by Karen Armstrong; A Perfect Summer, by Juliet Nicholson; How the Irish Saved Civilization, by Thomas Cahill

I think I can complete at least those three by March, even if it means shunning all those other wonderful books out there until I am finished! Must….be…..strong…….

Good Luck, Read-A-Thoners!

deweys-readathonbuttonGood luck to everyone participating in Dewey’s 24-Hour Read-A-Thon! I’m not participating, nor am I an official cheerleader, but I hope to be stopping by to encourage all of you. Happy Reading!